renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square162linkfedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square162linkfedilink
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·1 年前Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
minus-squareMatriks404@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?
Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
TOML or bust
yes.
Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?