Yepp, and no one really listens to the others, just trying to remember what you did and make sure no one dumps more work on you.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Sure, but even if they started tomorrow it would probably be years before it even could be considered experimental outside of the most daring early adaptors.
Having a combability layer is not ideal but it would mean they could have something worker for more users faster and at the same time see which modules/drivers they should focus on.
“Thread closed due to inactivity.”
Tanoh@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Debian maintainer unilaterally strips KeepassXC package of a lot of features81·1 year agoHe could have handled it better. But he didn’t call the code crap directly, just the bundle of everything.
Having a meta package and let users choose seems like the best way. But this is a Debian issue, and not a keepassxc issue. It is up to Debian to package it anyway they want.
Tanoh@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Debian maintainer unilaterally strips KeepassXC package of a lot of features91·1 year agoExactly. And if you want those features, you install the full version. Packages can break in sid, that is the whole point of it.
I am also running sid and keepassxc and I see no problem with this change. In fact it seems like a very sane thing to do, and something I wished more packages did.
now that IPv6 has been adopted globally.
Now that is a quality joke
Why not just go full WSL?
Yepp. Started using Debian around the Ham/Slink releases, haven’t found any reason to change yet.