My impression is that with some guidance it can put together a basic skeleton of complex stuff too. But you need a specialist level of knowledge to fix the fail at compile level mistakes or worse yet mistakes that compile but don’t at all achieve the intended result. To me it has been most useful at getting the correct arguments for argument heavy libraries like plotly, remembering how to do stuff in bash or learning something from scratch like 3js. Soon as you try to do something more complex than it can handle, it confidently starts cycling through the same couple of mistakes over and over. The key words it spews in those mistakes can sometimes be helpful to direct your search online though.

So it has the potential to be helpful to a programmer but it cant yet replace programmers as tech bros like to fantasize about.

wow havent seen anything this moody in a long while

hold on mma get my vim banner and holy sword of buffering

More importantly, can it run doom?

the church of uncle bob would like to speak to you about the sins of commenting.

they were never meant to be together, they would confuse the hell out of each other. Imagine they have two kids and she says pick kid[1] from the school, then what?

given that LLMs and gen AIs are great at talking bullshit and creating presentations, one is a more realistic expectation than the other

wow wouldn’t guess gpu architecture is compatible with parsing tasks

The obvious solution is parsing jsons with gpus? maybe not…

I invite op to Turkey

C++ and C compilers are much more friendly now a days