

What do you mean by flatpak being deeply imperfect?
What do you mean by flatpak being deeply imperfect?
I used to run Reborn OS at around 2017 for a few years. It used Cnchi installer, just like Antergos, and when Antergos died, I saw Reborn as its successor. But the title went to Endeavour (why?) and Reborn never got popularity.
Right. Cjakra and KaOS were two I was following the developments as a KDE lover. Too bad none got popular enough, and Chakra even died :(
Its unpopularity may be related to that it asks money or a positive review in a blog to even try. Used to be so a few years ago.
What can flatpaks do that others -snap, appimage- can’t? At least they don’t have weird naming of program (com.sth.sth.fk)…
deleted by creator
Don’t listen to people. Choose any distro that is newbie friendly. If you don’t choose, you are still choosing. The worst of your choices is probably better than what you are currently using.
I am planning for XP.
Panel colourizer is the only new thing I found. Will try. Thanks.
Can virt-manager boot windows boxes?
(☝︎ ՞ਊ ՞)☝︎
oflag=direct
What does this do?
Correct. They have the history of “the best use of desktop space” from unity DE. Although I will not forgive canonical for dropping unity, the gnome they have is close.
I have also seen some desktops of my hospital labs using Ubuntu. Must say, amidst all the win7 monitors, that looked so sexy…
I also see delayed response in displaying shutdown options.
Nautilus is abomination in the file browser. Except maybe deepin’s