• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Might as well ban stack overflow based contributions as well.

    AI is a great tool for coding. As long as it’s used responsibly. Like any other tool, really.

    • 30p87@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      External LLMs are great for getting ideas and a quick overview of something, and helpers integrated into IDEs are useful to autocomplete longer lines of code or repetitive things.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Górny took issue with everything from the energy consumption driven by AI

    This has to be a joke. The team behind a distro that compiles everything from scratch all the time is concerned about wasting power now? The only distro for which I ever setup a compile cluster?

    Give me a break. This is the new luddite movement.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta say your comment makes an insightful impression, however Gentoo compilations are peanuts compared to the massive energy sucking hype that A.I. is. I am glad that people speak out publicly against this insane madness. A.I. hyping during climate crisis ? Overwhelming sales of SUVs Plans to move to planet Mars Who would have guessed that years ago ?

    • nivenkos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the new luddite movement.

      It really is. Degrowth is destitution and death - just look at Germany.

      We need to decouple electricity production from environmental damage - build renewable power and nuclear power station en masse and invest heavily in nuclear fusion.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who regularly saves time by automating, I can’t get on board for a movement which directly opposes process improvement by improving efficiency.

          • verdigris@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re not, they’re opposing a process that leads to garbage output and horrible systemic efficiency.

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Luddites objected primarily to the rising popularity of automated textile equipment, threatening the jobs and livelihoods of skilled workers as this technology allowed them to be replaced by cheaper and less skilled workers.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

              I’ve also read a book on the subject of Luddites and it was clear to me that it was a response to higher efficiency machinery replacing the need for a good portion of their jobs.

        • nivenkos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the lump of labour fallacy is wrong - in the end automation makes us all wealthier as goods become cheaper, and people can do more productive work (and be better educated for it too).