If you have to choose between using an App Image, from the developpers official site or an AUR package (or apt e.g), what do you choose?

    • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It does not only make config can be stored but can also be used on other drives

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t see the use-case for this that couldn’t be handled by syncthing, rclone, github, or whatever offline storage you’re using for backups. I think I’m missing something…

        • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, you’re missing something. AppImage’s portable config feature can also make you use your config on other drive. You don’t need to symlink your config to ~/.config. you can use your config directly on your other drive

          • brax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, but why would I want to do that? I don’t understand what problem this is solving…

            The benefit is that I can save a fraction of a second by not having to symlink a config file… At the cost of having to use a bloated app system?

            • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I don’t understand what problem this is solving…

              AppImage’s portable config feature is very useful if you use live usb, and AppImage’s portable config feature makes your ~/ clean from scattered application configs

              • brax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Ah ok, now that makes a bit more sense. Yeah, I guess for the sake of app portability, appimages and the like do make a lot of sense.