I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it’s my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won’t announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that’s not enough.

I’ve been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I’ve decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

  • Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Fedora, great blend of bleeding edge and stability. Plus Linus uses it, so what better praise could you get.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I hope we’re talking about that Linus, and not that Linus. You know, the one that works with computers, and not the other one that works with computers.

    • heythatsprettygood@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Can definitely recommend Fedora too. Software updates are at a good pace, and the system has a lot of polish all around. For example, all you need to do for updates is to press “update” in Discover and it’ll do everything for you, applying on reboot for stability. Most things “just work”.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        that’s exactly how updates should work in every desktop distro. as an option of course.

        systemd made it possible to install updates on shutdown.
        packagekit enabled kde software to automatically obtain and prepare the updates.
        plasma does the final touch nowadays to ask you on the reboot/shutdown dialog whether you want to install them.

        Basically all the system is in place, with code from widely used parties. packagekit can even integrate with your filesystem to make a snapshot before install. It’s wonderful. yet, it seems as if only fedora supports this full setup right now? or is there anything else?

        • heythatsprettygood@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve tried quite a few distros (openSUSE, Ubuntu, Solus, Arch, so on) and none seem to offer this feature. It’s a shame, as it’s quite useful to have since updating a live system can sometimes cause some trouble. Even just the updating from Discover can be broken on some systems (I know openSUSE at the very least acts a bit funny when it comes to PackageKit, I think Arch as well).

    • Philamand@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The only issue is that you provide free testing for IBM, so it’s a no go if you try to boycott/avoid US companies. If you don’t it’s indeed a great choice.

          • verdigris@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            As long as they’re not for the core Fedora projects why not? Bugs for those should be scarce and there are many other users to report them anyway.

            Using and contributing to FOSS is hardly scabbing regardless. Unless you’re donating to the project I wouldn’t consider even bug reporting as directly supporting IBM. The tangible profit to them is pennies if that.