I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it’s my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won’t announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that’s not enough.

I’ve been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I’ve decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

  • Karna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Just to reiterate the same point - in fixed release, a package version is not released until all known issues are resolved.

    At no point, it is end user responsibility to bother checking anything before installing a new version.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      in fixed release, a package version is not released until all known issues are resolved.

      That’s not really true. It’s more important that the issues are known. Sometimes they actually wait longer to fix issues since it would introduce changes

      • Karna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        My bad, I meant “known major issues”. If minor issues are not fixed, they document it on release note. But, at no point any fixed release distro ever released breaking changes “knowingly”.

      • Karna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Bugs are of two types - known (found during testing by Distro maintainer) and unknown.

        Fixed release fixes known bugs before pushing packages.

        It is following the standard development life cycle.