• Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Debian daring to suggest that using your real name to identify yourself on the system is a reasonable choice for most people. So get the torches and pitchforks…

    Also don’t tell those people about the fact that such fields for additional information (like real name, address etc) exist in most user-handling parts of their software since forever.

    You get asked for your real name when creating a new user for longer than Linux even exists. It’s just that noone actually cares. But now that’s suddenly an horrific anti privacy policy because the narrative demand that it is.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s always been thus, tho, I think?

      Seems like our times are troubled enough that identity is become a powderkeg issue, which I can understand.

      But I don’t think Debian is forcing us to inscribe our legal names here.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The most reasonable choice now may not be the same forever. The optional indentifying fields themselves may have not have changed on Linux over the years but external changes in soceity has prompted this conversation.

      With nefarious “child safety” laws popping up the introduction of an optional age field is tone-deaf and suspect. There are other objections to SystemD but this personally pushed me over the edge to finally try out another Linux distro (from Mint).