CONCLUSION: I will stop watching them since all of these alligations and “false?” hardware testing makes me not wanna support them. Even if most of them aren’t true, i don’t want to risk it

ive heard some mixed things about ltt so i want to know if theyre actually bad or not

and im not watching them for linux help, i just like the content, but i also dont want to support a bad person

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I have a relatively positive view on LTT compared to others here.

    You can’t succeed on youtube without engaging in some of their clickbait bullshit thumbnails and titles. Although they’re relatively honest in actually covering what they say in the title… So over dramatic titles, but not quite click bait.

    No content can be all things to all people. LTT is relatively “casual techy”. If you’re techy enough to be able to manage Linux yourself, then it’s probably not for you. You don’t need then to show you how to put a PC together, or to break the news to you that self hosting or home network storage is a thing.

    The content also aimed at a certain audience. If you want more academic hardware testing and analysis, then there’s Gamers Nexus. If you want in depth gaming news/analysis then there are better channels for that too. These guys look at random tech at times too (car related or making craft art cushions or something). These guys are basically the “Top Gear with Jeremy Clarkson” of tech.

    Things like the sexual harassment issue and things like that, I’m not as concerned about. If you work in big corporations then you know these problems exist everywhere, what matters is how you deal with them. The court of public opinion followed the drama and came to their own conclusions. This just plays out publically because they’re very public with their content.

    As for Linux specifically, they did some noob videos where uninitiated staff tried to jump into Linux and hit a bunch of roadbumps (which happens often in Windows transition, fine to be open about that, but it also isn’t a big deal for the first adoption to need troubleshooting). They labelled Linux as no good for regular use at that point which angered the internet. Since then I think they’ve realised:

    1. They were unfair to Linux
    2. They’ve made no allies anywhere by hating on Linux
    3. It’s a free win for them if they say some good things about Linux.

    So now they seem a lot more positive about Linux. But don’t go here looking for anything Linux related.

    I think you should just watch some of their videos from main LTT, short circuit, etc and see if you find it entertaining for yourself.

    • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Sexual assault allegations not being a big deal to you is already a huge yikes. But you’re also blatantly ignoring all of the other issues over the years:

      • Stealing and auctioning prototype hardware from startups
      • Underpaying employees and turning their termination details into content
      • Making his employees renovate his mansion
      • Buying a private jet for private family use (already bad) and then trying to pass it off as a business expense
      • Repeatedly claiming Linux is garbage because he’s actually too dumb (or paid off) to follow basic instructions as a “tech expert” despite his basement gremlin assistant figuring it out fine
      • Been shown with hard facts to regularly misrepresent products and their specs due to poor reviewing and testing standards by actual professionals in the space (and claims its too expensive to do so anyways. Remember that jet?)
      • In response to all of this has acted like a whiny toddler caught at the cookie jar and cries that everyone else is worse (source needed). As far as I understand it, the podcast nowadays is essentially Linus claiming he’s a tech God among plebs while previously mentioned basement gremlin cackles and calls him a good master
    • fratermus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You can’t succeed on youtube without engaging in some of their clickbait bullshit thumbnails and titles.

      I’d agree if we stipulate that succeed == make a living off a mass casual audience . For other definitions of succeed it’s quite possible to do without dumbing down. Soft White Underbelly, Forgotten Weapons, Hydraulic Press Channel off the top of my head.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      So now they seem a lot more positive about Linux. But don’t go here looking for anything Linux related.

      They are so childish and ignorant in their approach to Linux, like claiming that the lack of Photoshop for Linux is a problem with Linux and not a problem with Photoshop.
      The ignorance and lack of logical thinking is astounding.

      It’s OK to say you may have problems if you are depending on software that is only available on Windows or MAC, but that is not a fault of Linux. It’s the fault of those vendors that don’t support Linux. It’s like the blaming the victim logical fallacy.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_blaming

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If a user needs Photoshop in their workflow then Linux isn’t an option for them. That is a problem with Linux, from a user perspective.

        Who’s at fault for that problem is a different question, and I’d be surprised if LTT ever say that Linux is to blame.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I’d be surprised if LTT ever say that Linux is to blame.

          He did EXACTLY that, just not about Photoshop, but a similar proprietary piece of software he used for his video editing that is very expensive and targeted ONLY to professionals. Which is not at all relevant for 99.9% of the people that watch his channel. So he basically failed Linux on issues that are irrelevant to by far the most people, either because he is an idiot or he is paid to do so. Which of those it is doesn’t really matter. The point is he made a devastating conclusion for Linux based on a fringe use case that isn’t representative, and he blamed Linux for not supporting the proprietary software and hardware he wanted to use, instead of blaming the vendors that have the responsibility for it, and are the ones making money on it! Because that’s how stupid and misleading he is.

          But this is no way near the only reason I have blocked his channel, it is also the blatant corrupt attitude when Ryzen was released, and his extreme favoritism of Intel, that then turned 180° shortly after Intel had announced they would decrease budgets for reviewers. We saw the same with GPU’s where he didn’t even review AMD cards, until suddenly he did, after AMD began paying for advertising on his channel.

          The corruption is extreme, and it’s all about which vendors pay him money, and not at all about the products or interest of consumers. Except he is good at pretending it is.

          LTT is an advertising company nothing more.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Presumably you can point me to a specific video, since you seem so completely sure of it. I’m not scrubbing through potentially hours of footage to try to find something that I don’t think exists.

            As for your suggestion that he just reviews what he’s paid to do, sure, that seems plausible. I’m not trying to argue that it’s an impartial channel and people should be watching him. You certainly don’t need to defend a decision to not watch it.