Thank you so much for your useful input.

Thats pretty kewl ill give it a go later.

In my opinion that was a little different. The enterprise was using the software basically, contributing nothing but selling services around it. The licence was meant to force them to help out monetarily from what they were making off it. But rather than do that Mason forked it and now have to support their own imp with their own devs.

Yeah that does seem like an odd way to go about it. Other than full system upgrades I can’t remember the last time I saw sudo in the upgrade list. Maybe I’ve just been missing it.

I guess they are going the steamos route seeing as arch based.

This makes sense and is quite common for opensource businesses. They have the main product which is open then they have a business only element either a module or plugin part which is designed for businesses not gen pop and isnt open. They screwed up the delivery on here and badly communicated it but if they did it right nobody would have noticed the secrets managment part at all because they don’t use bw business.

Better than collabora or the other way round?

Collabora has been around for a while I’ve just been using that