caseyweederman

I installed Arch on my daily driver because I wanted a challenge.
It’s too dependable, even when updating every other day and installing a bunch of nonsense from the AUR. Where’s my challenge?

recently

Unity and Mir would like a word

Huh, it’s Russian? That’s to your point about them hiding it I guess.
The Excel part looked flawless, a closer match than I’ve seen, but I didn’t get into any of the advanced features. PowerPoint and Word documents also retained full formatting when opening documents authored in the official platforms.

Why downvotes? OnlyOffice is great.

Ah yes, the “extended Berkeley Packet Filter”.
Wikipedia:

eBPF is a technology that can run programs in a privileged context such as the operating system kernel.

Phoronix:

Hornet uses a similar signature verification scheme similar to that of kernel modules. A pkcs#7 signature is appended to the end of an executable file. During an invocation of bpf_prog_load, the signature is fetched from the current task’s executable file. That signature is used to verify the integrity of the bpf instructions and maps which where passed into the kernel. Additionally, Hornet implicitly trusts any programs which where loaded from inside kernel rather than userspace, which allows BPF_PRELOAD programs along with outputs for BPF_SYSCALL programs to run.

So this is to make kernel-level instructions from userspace (something that’s already happening) more secure.

The thread linked by the OP is Jarkko Sakkinen (kernel maintainer) seemingly saying “show your work, your patch is full of nonsense” in a patch submitted for review to the Linux kernel.
Edit: the OP has edited the link, it used to point to this comment in the mailing list chain.

I’m really enjoying it, thank you.

I mean I wouldn’t mind defeating the purpose of anticheat. Let’s all defeat the purpose of anticheat.

Will that add two minutes to my boot time though?

I have a related issue. Mine is a network share and it’s in fstab, but I have Linux boot without waiting for wifi, so the mount fails and then asks for root password when I try to mount it later.
I think I just need to add “user” to the options field, right?

duf is pretty slick

That’s a weird way to spell Baobab

Will this make my *arrs stop killing my seeds? What do I need to do to have that?

They might have but I certainly don’t

Right.
My point is that a wrench was needed and a batmobile was recommended.

Right, but the entirety of Cockpit is not necessarily required.

That’s probably because of netplan, right? You should be able to get the same results with just netplan try.

You can launch single applications with X forwarding, and X can launch applications without a desktop.
Depending on needs, a web interface may be better. Like Cockpit or something more application-specific.

Micro is Nano but the commands make sense. It’s so nice.
It even prompts you for a sudo password when you try to save but don’t have permission.

You can get Gnome on Fedora. It won’t have Apt.
Packages will have a different naming scheme based on the maintainers’ preferences, even between Debian and Ubuntu (though those are usually pretty minor).
Your muscle memory is gonna trip you up for a while though.

I’d suggest the KDE flavor of Debian, then. Its settings manager is divine, and its software management platform ties every other package management system in (apt/dpkg for Debian, yum for Redhat, pacman for Arch, plus flatpak, nixpkg, and even snaps if you absolutely must). By default starting in Plasma 6.0.

More to @fmstrat’s point, and to suggest a possible cause your friend had that impression: if you install the Minimal flavor of any distro, you’re going to get a minimal experience.