You know what they say: (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞Fight executive’s bullshit with executive’s bullshit.
You know what they say: (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞Fight executive’s bullshit with executive’s bullshit.
Personally I would happily let my AI bot attend the stupid scrum meetings for me. Let it tell my scrum master and stakeholders whatever the progress of my day of work and in the sprint. Don’t bother me in my coding time.
Well, with root enabled, the SSH server at least need to verify the key, no? It’s wasting CPU power albeit tiny amount.
Do you just want to see the text content of a HTML file? - a text editor
Do you want most, if not all, HTML tags to be rendered as pretty graphical shapes?
Do you want the text have proper fonts?
Styles? You need something to parse CSS files.
What about dynamically generated content like ten smiley faces? You need a JavaScript engine.
Do you also want to see iframes? You need it to be capable of sending XHR requests.
What if it references to a piece of WebAssembly?
It’s way more complicated than you anticipated.
Or, you know, run it in a chroot.
What’s wrong with http://makemkv.com/? I’ve used it for years for lossless backup DVD/BD and no issue.
There are so many posts about made in EU software recently. What happened?
What you described as the weakness, is actually what is strong of an open source system. If you compile a binary for a certain system, say Debian 10, and distribute the binary to someone who is also running a Debian 10 system, it is going to work flawlessly, and without overhead because the target system could get the dependency on their own.
The lack of ability to run a binary which is for a different system, say Alpine, is as bad as those situations when you say you can’t run a Windows 10 binary on Windows 98. Alpine to Debian, is on the same level of that 10 to 98, they are practically different systems, only marked behind the same flag.
Thank you. Would you mind explaining what this means please? What is a U.S.-sanctioned place? Why does the U.S. government think this is a bad thing?
contributor being geolocated in a US-sanctioned place
Imagine a contributor of the project. He would have been fixing the bug for free and give the work to the public project. Right before he submits the code change, he sees an ad from a big tech bro: “Hiring. Whoever can fix this bug gets this job and a sweet bonus.” He hesitated and worked for the company instead.
Now that he is the employee of the company. He can’t submit the same bug fix to the open source project because it is now company property. The company’s product is bug free, and the open source counterpart remains buggy.
shitty shit
Bloat! Somebody call the police!
Ceep up the good work oops.
The official website?
It’s a skill which not many have.
I think this is why OP got 21 downvotes. It is unreasonable to demand something fast, free, and good. You are going to get flatpak if you want it fast and free.
How about compiling from source? Or look into how Debian/Ubuntu/Mint build the gimp
package, then change the version and run the build process on your local machine?
No. Feel free to download shit and even attempt to run shit. Chances are they won’t run because shits are compiled against glibc and my system is not.
Commit1: actual change
Commit2: this code is so misleading and I have to refactor it refactors
Me: painfully rejects PR the story said nothing about refactoring…
“I plan to celebrate my son’s birthday next month. Do you think it helps if I marry eight more wives?”
I think you were being biased.
Is there a filter to block all these EU OS posts, please?
As I see it, it’s hardly an open source project but just some malicious start up attempting to get funded by EU then flee off.
Show me your production ready OS, not your POC boot screens.
And perhaps properly name your product. Naming it after ‘EU’ is self-righteous. What comes next? Earth OS?