• istdaslol@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Mint is just the GOAT, I was able to install it on family members PCs and tell them it’s windows but looks different and they had no issues doing their normal office stuff while getting better performance and security updates (looking at you windows 11)

      • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Makes some good points, mint is the closest experience you can get to windows. And one thing I think people who are getting uppity about the idea of that don’t get is, if you want more mainstream adaptation of Linux, YOU. NEED. THAT.

        I remember the story of a man trying to get his mom onto Linux and she broke down crying at one point because learning all the new things was stressful for her, completely turned her off of Linux.

        Mint isn’t for the sweaty arch-bros of the world, it’s a valuable onboarding tool for the rest of us who didn’t spend our childhood scripting shell commands to do random shit on our PC’s in grade school. IMHO, Adapt to accessibility or get the hell out of the way.

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I dunno, I use Garuda and it’s an Arch distro. It’s been super user friendly and I’ve only had to learn console stuff when I wanted to mess with stuff most casual users wouldn’t be bothered with.

          And maybe you would say, “well that’s not really representative of a normal Arch install” but isn’t that the point of different distros? That anyone can build on functionality to do something like make Arch more user friendly?

      • CannonGoBoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        An update black screened his system and corrupted his time shift backups. So he gave Linux Mint a shot and has been using it for several weeks.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Could very well happen on Mint as well. Should switch to atomic, if that’s his main concern.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Mint is a good choice because it has an easy timeshift option, so a problem in an update is just a rollback/recover. Same as Snapper Rollback on distros like OpenSUSE, it means a non savvy Linux user can reboot and have it fixed. That is appealing for a lot of users that don’t want to bother with finding the fix

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              According to the previous comment, he had Time Shift but the files were corrupted.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Does ubuntu have this? Or does one need to install something to set this up

              • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                You can install time shift on Ubuntu, with Mint it is part of the install process iirc, and default snapshotting with OpenSUSE install

          • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It could happen with anything, but since Mint 17.3 (2015) the only serious corruption I’ve experienced is during a major OS upgrade. I had far more problems with Windows.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Won’t happen with atomic. If the update fails, it just automatically rolls back.

        • Glifted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Its bad but weirdly its the only one to get all my shit working.

          I’d like to switch back to Crunchbang++ but I was having problems running some things

      • hilliard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        nothing wrong with Mint, but it isnt some magical distro, and I’m so sick of hearing about it that my ears pretty much [bleed]
        every single “What distro should I try?” thread: “Mint” “I recommend Mint” "Why use x when you could use Mint?" “MINT!”… /rant

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It is not that it is the best distro, its that it is the easier onboarding experience for a windows user

          • hilliard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            many distros fall into that category, elementary, zorin, kubuntu, etc. mint isnt even at the top of most such lists
            just seems weird. I mean, the OP is pretty much a blatant commercial. “It just works-out-of-the-box!” yeah, they kind of all do
            but mostly
            I just wanna hate on the thing everyone likes, probably. I was a punkrock kid :-)

              • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Are you one of those ‘Systemd is bad’ type people too? I could see you making the argument that any distro that allows you to install systemd is bad, defaults be damned.

                I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic. Apologies if you were.

  • deadcatbounce@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    You should go see Gentoo or something if ArchLinux causes you problems.

    It’s my go-to rescue cum doing-backups cum new-install distribution because it’s clean (meaning low cruft), minimalist, and most importantly, rolling. I run it as a console OS. I adore it.

    Have I run it as my Workstation OS? Yes. Would I again? No. It was too fragile then.

    Pacman is too strange to use with the options reduced to letters and having to include the double dash every time you remember the long form. Gimme dnf, Aptitude or flatpak.

    My daily driver is Fedora. Is my heart in my mouth every six months when 4,000 packages all need reinstalling? Yes.

    Have I tried Debian Testing&Sid as semi-rolling? Yes, fantastic, until they did something weird with systemd instead of just doing the conf locations as intended like everyone else. And the weak-dependencies lists were unfunny. Did I mention I loved aptitude?!

    Have I tried, source distros (exherbo, Gentoo, funtoo)? Yes, never got any work done. I was always compiling something for that 1% corner-case performance gain.

    Don’t think I’ll try anything else save maybe openSUSE or that NixOS. The first seriously, the second for fun - NixOS smells a tiny bit like Gentoo or ArchLinux to me (sorry, not sorry).

    Personally, I think bro needs an immutable Linux OS. Fedora SilverBlue, openSUSE MicroOS, the ArchLinux one.

    Then someone needs to write a timer such that when he’s really concentrating hard at 2am, it stops and puts some graphical meme on the screen for three hours. Then he’ll feel at home.

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      "This goes against my distro choice and I need validation to feel superior! "

      Reading the comments, it’s obvious they either didn’t watch the video and those that did, missed the point of what he was saying and got butthurt instead… Internet comments on a nutshell

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Dude straight up says “SteamOS doesn’t work on everything” and in almost the same sentence says “Bazzite is cool”. This guy does not understand puters AT ALL 🤣

    Also, the rant about the terminal while complaining about Arch about made me laugh so hard I’d sploosh.

    Using a tool for a job you don’t understand will yield unexpected results, fool. 😘

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What’s wrong about that statement? Try installing SteamOS on Nvidia hardware and tell me how it went ;) why do you think Bazzite exists in the first place? SteamOS in it’s current state is not meant to be installed on other hardware, it’s a recovery image for the deck. Sure, if you have compatible AMD hardware you COULD do it, but you can’t even choose which drive to install it on cause there is no proper installer. If you want the SteamOS experience on other devices just use Bazzite.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Dude straight up says “SteamOS doesn’t work on everything” and in almost the same sentence says “Bazzite is cool”. This guy does not understand puters AT ALL

      I guess I don’t understand them either. Care to explain?