I always unable to upgrade ubuntu based distros. I always need to reinstall

Thats a lie afaik

Ah right, that was it

They literally wanted to close source as much as possible afaik.

But unsure if its true. Somethinf in that direction of fedora abd locking down was a thing. It rose a question on GPL if its really working or allowed, as they abused loopholes

I kinda remember having similar issues years ago, when transitioning from Pulseaudio to Pipewire on Ubuntu based distros like PopOS.

A bad guess is that either pipewire-pulse and pipewire-alsa was missing or I changed wireplumber to the other thing. I am very unsure, but it was a huge mess to play around and constantly switch between pipewire and pulseaudio to test things.

Damn… so I dont need to switch. Thanks a lot.

I felt like things doesnt matter, because they donated a lot to other projects and stuff, which a trumpist would never do and instead would start with a worse service for more money.

I kinda dislike the default LibreWolf settings. Unsure if they changed it, but I remember that you have no history except you change it in the settings.

A Windows refugee wants a history. Addituonally, many pages just dont work.

My University also does capture a picture and reads it from the Canvas or something, which LibreWolf blocks. It doesnt show again if something is okay or wrong. I just got a Mail that I need to reupload it and go by myself to pickup my University-Card.

I wasnt the only one as Informatics has many Linux users and some Librewolf users.

There is a difference between a donation and a purchase. You can buy Ubuntu Pro like Zorin Pro. Its not free

But Privacy

I have it too now with KDE. Seems like something new

Having the same issue on Intel + AMD GPU.

Arch Linux with newest KDE.

Why not Slackware?

I like the crazyness. Idk why people downvote you

Had bronchitis as a child nearly every few weeks for years. All gone but sucks to have it.

Get well soon.

I still feel like, the point where you say more people can use it and will use it, can create a dark pattern.

Imagine you create something and make people depending on it. Another cooperation copies it and advances it with a lot of money. Somehow, the ecosystem is so changed, that when you depend on that project, you need to use the newer version of the cooperation and soon they will paywall it heavily.

Then, your wish for people using the code as much as possible got nuked.

I assume that many scenarios will allow the usage of your old MIT project without relying on the new version of someone. But rare cases exist, where this happens. Its like predicting the 30th step in chess or smth. (Idk chess that well)

Its… unlikely that it will happen, but yeah. I can understand your perspective, but slowly going to AGPL sounds right.

A glitch in the matrix.

Ok idk. Your message felt like it wants to explain why we shouldnt use GPL/lgpl

In my Company, we do use such code. But its mainly because we distribute our own Propriatary Linux OS.

We sometimes need to change such code, so we just put it on Github as a fork.

Sorry, but I or rather many hate your Opinion.

Its ok if you dislike my Opinion about that. But I will show you, that many dislike your Opinion with a little fun and humour.

I believe that this has nothing to do with growing up, but I think thats your opinion you can attempt to follow.

I hate, when programs like Firefox or anything else uses something like Nautilus to pick the file.

I can’t even press ctrl+L to change the URL of my filesystem where I want to be. I need a lot of clicky GUI to get to the desination…

People say Qt sucks. But there is literally no better alternative to the KDE environment. Either Dolphin or tons of other apps just have more features and settings compared to GTK ones.

Unsure if they have the same issue