I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s pretty simple and straightforward, all you have to so is buy the cable and a professional cable tester to see what specs it’s actually in compliance with

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Don’t worry, I’m sure when USB 4 releases, they’ll retroactively change the names of USB 3.2 Gen 1 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 to “USB 4.3 Gen 0.01” and “USB 4.3 Gen 0.02” respectively. Then USB 4 will actually be named “USB 4.4 Gen 5” just because.

        And none of the cables will be labeled, nor will they simultaneously support high power delivery and full data speed. We’ll need to wait for “USB 4.4 Gen 4” for that, which is when the old standard will get renamed to “USB 4.4 Gen 3.5” instead.

      • amorpheus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        These days a ~10€ gadget can tell you about the electricity going through a USB connection and what the cable is capable of. I don’t like the idea of basically requiring this to get that knowledge, but considering the limited space on the USB-C plugs I’m not sure anything is likely to improve about their labeling.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Nope! That’s part of the fun sadly. At least if you’re technical you’ll know that not all type-c cables are the same.