Some of you need to watch this video, and hang your head in shame.

Dylan Taylor has been receiving constant harassment, including threats to his life and safety, for actions done collectively by SystemD. The article by Sam Bent was explictly mentioned as part of the harassment campaign, and rightfully so.

I don’t think enough people realize that this is catastrophically bad. It’ll discourage people from becoming open source developers, it’ll discourage people from using Linux, and it’ll discourage legislators from taking the Linux community seriously.

If you ever wished ill upon another human being for complying with a relatively inconsequential law, you are better off never touching a computer again. The Linux community has collectively gone so far beyond what is acceptable here.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This field will NEVER affect you unless you choose to install software on your system that requires it.

    If the field did not exist software could not be made to utilize it.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Do you think that would prevent or discourage age verification software from existing? It’s not as if a systemd user field is the only place a user’s birthday could be stored.

      Realistically, age verification software that is seriously attempting age verification isn’t even going to touch the systemd field, because why would it? The field could only be trusted if it is managed by an age verification service anyway, in which case the service could just as easily store the data outside of systemd.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Who gets to decide what software should and should not be allowed to exist?

      If someone wanted to store a birthDate (and, evidence exists to say that they do) then the most logical place to store that user detail is with all of the other user details… in systemd.

      You can choose what you put on your system, that’s the Free in FOSS. But, you cannot choose what other people put on their systems.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Its not leaving a lot of choice if it’s part of systemd and I’d wager far more people do not want this than were asking for it. There’s no benefit to it except for the government and corporations that want your data.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The field doesn’t do anything by itself. There is zero harm inflicted on people using systemd. There are probably lots of features of systemd that you don’t want or use and the entire negative effect that you suffer is a few megabytes less free storage space.

          The only way the field would be used is if a person decided to use a different piece of software that wants a birthdate. If they don’t choose to install such a program then the field is no more a danger than the realName or location fields. They have scary sounding labels but do absolutely nothing unless the user chooses to use them.

    • liuther9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I ve got a feeling he wont change his mind. This kind of people are just too optimistic