• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    20 years ago, fixing easy stuff in Linux was a matter of Google searching, finding it, then copy pasting what you needed to do from the browser into a terminal.

    Since the beginning, the difference between a problem in Windows and a problem in Linux is that the problem in Windows can (and often does) hit a dead end - proprietary wall, it’s broke and you just have to live with it. In Linux (more generally: free open source software) it may be broke, but the fix is always possible, if you’re willing to put in the necessary work.

    With AI reducing the effort necessary to do this kind of work, rather dramatically, I expect Linux and FOSS in general to be getting a bit of a boost. Not taking over the world, 2030 still won’t be the year of the Linux desktop, but… the ability to scratch all the itches is more valuable today than it was a year ago.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I used to fairly frequently hit dead ends on Linux, e.g. regarding Wifi drivers or getting some (Linux) applications running. But the driver situation has improved greatly, and thanks to Flatpak, Distrobox & co. I’ve only ever run into one application I couldn’t install - a corporate antivirus. Whoopsie!

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        regarding Wifi drivers or getting some (Linux) applications running

        Yeah, there is that about drivers, definitely been there and there were times “the grass was greener in Redmond” - but… as you say that has improved, to the point that I recently can’t get Windows WiFi drivers from Ezurio, but they support every flavor of Linux.